Finally, my personal nightmare of almost two months shows cracks and strips of sunlight on the horizon before me. Much pain remains ahead, but now I believe I have measured and prepared for it. The anguish I see in my friends back on Planet Healthy leaves me faintly amused—something in the spirit of, “I should have such problems!” Yet the dissolution of a society and a civilization is, of course, no smiling matter. I don’t mean to sound unsympathetic. I say only that those who grieve should pause to thank God for the full breath and firm steps they can give to grieving.
And so I offer, on this very darkest of days imaginable for many of you, a brief speech of the imaginary Representative James Fairplay. I borrowed the name from a silly little Jules Verne novel which I crawled through half-conscious in my personal twilight. The surname’s Bunyonesque quality appeals to me: for Mr. Fairplay, you must realize from the outset, is a thoroughly fair-minded human being.
My course for the next two years, at least [runs the speech], is fixed. I did not accept the honor of representing my fellow citizens simply to cast the office into the gutter and declare all functions of our government dead… yet neither will my personal honor permit me to participate in a pantomime wherein we reps and senators act as if led by a duly elected president. I refuse to call this pretender my president. I refuse to rise when he enters the room. I will not attend his State of the Union addresses or other public events. I will boycott receptions and celebrations where he promises to be present. He needn’t worry about my rising from a crowd to shout “Liar!” at him, for no crowd spread before him will ever include me. If I should find myself trapped in such an assembly, I will slip away as quickly and quietly as possible. If I’m at a ball game and he makes an appearance to throw out the first pitch, I gather my family together at once, and we all leave.
I will not fight my war for the recovery of what shreds of our republic may yet be salvaged by hurling names across the aisle. My conduct, rather, will be a steady broadcast to the world that we are ruled by a pretender. My forever proclaimed, almost always wordless truth will be that we have no legitimate leader. My testimony of every day, mostly silent, will be that I serve a nation whose highest office has been hijacked and whose Constitution has been brutally raped.
This is where our resistance should start, in my opinion. There are those who would have Ashli Babbitt, the military veteran, wife, and mother who was gunned down by Capital police, become the first fallen hero in a new civil war, and I will not dispute her claim to patriotic heroism. But I also don’t think it does much heavy lifting. I think all of us, rather, need to embrace our inner Fairplay and settle into a grinding habit of telling the truth—or, perhaps even more than that, of standing for the truth. Mr. Trump excelled at chaining a name to an epithet during his mercurial political career: Lying Ted, Crooked Hillary, Sleepy Joe. It was effective in a childish way. What if we, as unplayful adults, insistently link our nation’s plunderers to the evidence of their plunder? “I won’t support Mr. Biden’s bills, whose presidency is illegitimate… our nation’s policy with China will remain in free fall until we have a legitimate president… I’m not surprised by the bid to pack the court, since it reflects the bullying anomy which brought this illegitimate regime to power.” Always, every day, speak the horrible truth out in the open.
It goes without saying that such truth-telling must extend to our handling of Mitch McConnell, John Cornyn, John Roberts, Brian Kemp, and other seasoned legions of the Devil’s Brigade who happen to have “R” after their name or a faux-conservative aura about their career. In fact, here I should imagine that speech is distinctly less important than example: than holding aloof, than avoiding bad company, than “moral distancing”. James Fairplay would be a less fitting guide to conduct now than the wizened veteran of many a broken treaty, Chief Nolo (Latin for “I will not”). Picture Chief Nolo arriving in Washington with the Oklahoma delegation. He will not attend dinner parties: he considers idle chatter a great corruptive of sacred mission. He will not show up for cocktail events: he doesn’t drink, and he knows that alcohol loosens promises and retards minds. He will not have his photo taken with Kevin McCarthy’s hand around his shoulder. He will not give interviews to foxy friends on turncoat networks. He will not practice for the annual D/R touch-football game; he will not even laugh at a good joke in the House’s corridors. His presence exudes utter gravity and commands respect. He’s “no fun” and “without interest” to the spiritual debris of Washington because he knows that the people among whom he moves have sold their birthright and betrayed their grandchildren. He never forgets that he has entered Hell to do Heaven’s work.
Let us stop being good colleagues, chatty interviews, and reach-across-the-aisle collaborators: that would be a good start. Let us always, always remember that we are vocal advocates for the plundered, like Mr. Fairplay, and also silent testaments to a present turned loathsome, like Chief Nolo. Tell the truth about all men, every day. Smile and fraternize with no man, on any day. Take yourself seriously: take the war seriously.
Bridges needn’t be blown. Missiles needn’t rain upon choice targets. The way we may begin to win is to bear witness, even silent witness. A black armband signifying mourning would be appropriate throughout 2021, should anyone have the guts to wear it. A Gandhi-like fast as yet another bill dispenses pork would blare almost as loud as Gabriel’s horn. Show resolve. Show character. Speak when the truth is being manhandled, and hurl silence when spoken words can only diminish the outrage.
There should be substantial irony in my posting on Christmas Eve an essay lamenting organized Christianity’s abandonment of its solemn duties. I didn’t plan to have the day and the theme run head-on into each other. In fact, I wasn’t fully aware that Christmas week was approaching when, in closing my last post, I wrote of…
a theme which deeply preoccupies me, and to which I would like to return soon: the betrayal of organized Christianity. Our betrayal by organized Christianity. “Humanitarian grounds”… : how many of us have heard from pulpits that Christ compels us to relinquish our earthly boundaries and welcome every wanderer to our hearth? “Brotherly love”: how many have heard that Christ preached a religion of peace and would deplore the presence of self-defensive weapons on our person or in our home? “Love-affirming, life-affirming”: how often have churches responded to a dictatorial command that they shut down while COVID rages with the meek acquiescence of, “Oh, yes! Whatever we can do to save lives!” Some phrase worthy of gracing a marquee in Podunk Baptist’s weekly message is wrapped around stupidly ineffectual, morally tainted, and physically destructive behavior… and we’re sent home with our painless lobotomy to marvel and drool at the collapse around us.
Why not just leave the subject alone for another week? People don’t read blogs over “the holidays”, anyway; and I, like most of you, have family gathered around the hearth today in an abundance that rarely occurs any longer. Just let it ride for now: laugh, hug, sing, eat… can’t we do that just for a bit, when it’s almost never done throughout the rest of our sad year?
And yet… well, here’s why I see no irony in the timing of my protest against the Church: because the celebration of Christmas should be about the birth of Christ, of all implied therein—and warm embrace of family during a wintry gathering of the clan is really not anywhere among those implications. On the contrary, the Festival of the Sun’s Return after the Winter Solstice is a major celebration on the pagan calendar (so major that Christian missionaries decided to adopt it as Christ’s birthday, too, rather than try to explain to their crude proselytes that the earth’s rhythms are not the highest expression of God’s will). It seems to me, rather, that the irony lies in our trying, year after year after year, to pretend that all is not lost in formal Western Christendom if only we can continue to bring Aunt Gussie to the table annually, to get Liam and Caroline out of their rooms and off their iPhones while presents are unwrapped, and to record (on the latest device) Laurie’s fitting a sweater on her dazed grandmother for a posterity that couldn’t care less. We’ll trudge through such personal rituals once more, because we desperately need them. We’ve never needed them more. But in revisiting them, we are very mistaken to suppose that we remain, after all—after still another year of giving vital ground—Christians at heart. We remain humans… but not every human is a Christian. That’s the irony: the dwindling evidence of our humanity impresses us more and more as incontrovertible evidence of our faith. It’s not, you know. It’s just not.
I invite you to join me in a simple exercise. Think of any ridiculously naïve hope or “vision”—one so absurd that a child who should cling to it beyond fourth or fifth grade might be thought a little behind the developmental curve. Let’s try, “I want peace everywhere, and forever. No more wars! We have to stop fighting.” Now look for some resonance of this childish platitude in the contemporary Christian church. Not very hard to find an echo, is it? “Christ enjoined us to live in peace. If we are the people of faith we claim to be, then we should not be deterred in seeking that peace by taking apparent existential risks.” Do we need to secure the power grid? Why, no! Why should we assume that other societies in the world want to harm us? Do we need to update our pitifully decrepit nuclear arsenal? Heavens, no! Let it rust away! The only reason other nations build such Doomsday weapons is because they see us doing so. It’s time to lead the way, to offer a Christian example.
And so the day comes when we have a choice between having all our children injected with computer chips to serve some secular overlord day and night or, in the event of non-cooperation, being annihilated. Yes, all of us owe God a death, sooner or later. But the “visionary” Christian leaves innumerable masses of innocents with no alternative to denying their spiritual identity other than Auschwitz. Is that really how faith works?
When our southern border was being inundated by unvetted immigrants (as it will soon be in exponentially greater volume), the “good Christian” raised the cry in public opinion polls closely followed by political hacks, “The children come first. These are children in need. Christ said, ‘Suffer the little ones to come unto me.’ We dare not turn these children away.” No… so a child-abuse trap was created, stupidly connived at by the “good Christian”, wherein criminal thugs bought or stole youngsters from their parents, tutored them to say Este hombre es mi papacita, sí, often shuttled them back across the border to run the same scam again, and along the way beat or raped them to secure abject obedience. And this humanitarian nightmare, as I say, was aided and abetted by good little suburban Christians who gave themselves a big virtue-hug at night before dozing off to sweet dreams.
Again, no awareness of the depth of human depravity: not much awareness, indeed, that depravity is embedded in the nature of the human animal. The concept of original sin was warped to cover all the curmudgeons and sourpusses who resisted the “vision”, who declined to take the “leap of faith”. It was never allowed to cast a shadow over the creatures of envy and lust at society’s fringe who had always waylaid utopian visions before.
Speaking of implanted computer chips… a friend sent me a link about a month ago to a video that spliced together a series of candid utterances, made by “visionaries” as recognizable as Bill Gates, in favor of extracting and inserting information directly into the world’s human masses. An attractive young woman struck me, especially, with her fervent insistence that “we need to take this step if we are to create the world we want.” I wouldn’t necessarily suspect any of these people of being Christian. The shame of it all is that I wouldn’t necessarily suppose that a mainstream Christian today would roar in protest. He should observe that such as we are do not create worlds—that the job has already been filled, and that our puny efforts to encroach upon it must always send infinite ripples of greed, arrogance, lust for power, and all the rest through the evolutionary brew. Instead, I can well imagine our casual Christian appropriating the language of “a better tomorrow” the way the early missionaries appropriated the Return of the Sun for Christ’s birthday. “Hey, that’s my gig—a better tomorrow! Yeah, we can do that! Eradicate poverty, extend health care to everyone, see that no child is left behind… we can all get to a better place if we suppress our egotism and serve Christ.”
And on and on. May I assume that this very brief characterization (which, alas, is no caricature) has brought two points to the surface? One is that late Western Christianity endorses a categorical suspicion, if not rejection, of limits. Our faith (sayeth the New Age preacher) exhorts us to admit no traditional restriction to the possibilities. If we only dream bravely enough, we can create the world of our dreams—a perfect world, without war or poverty or disease; for this is what Christ called us to do. Halleluiah, halleluiah!
The second point is that no effort is invested among such “faithful” in pondering the failures generated by “dream faith”. A particular peace hasn’t lasted because elements among us have too little faith; perfect health hasn’t been restored because elements among us have refused to join in an unprecedented initiative (e.g., universal masking, vaccinating, and locking down). The dream is always insulated from scrutiny. Why, Christ walked on water! Do you suppose He could have done that if the least thought about sinking had entered His mind?
The seamless fusion of “dream faith” with the secular-progressive political mentality should be evident to anyone with ears to hear. Is it any wonder that the formal, organized Christian church has reliably worked against the Christian worldview over the past four or five decades (with accelerating commitment)? “Social justice” is what matters, not the struggle of each human individual to hear God’s call through the cacophony of unfair circumstances around him. “Love” is what matters in marriage, not the acceptance of several strictures (duty to children, abstinence from other partners, embrace of self-sacrifice, etc.) which severely reduce our future options in our fourscore years on earth.
Every inspiration of “dream faith” is open-ended, and hence impossible to restrain from collateral damage or assess for deficient responsibility. The “believer” is caught in an orgy of star-gazing that spins him into delirium but advances him toward his higher identity not a single step. True faith, by accepting that Creation has thrown up barriers here, here, and here, humbles us as we conform our progress to those barriers and impresses us, ultimately, with the immutable truth that the destination for all our inklings of perfection must be a world beyond this one. He of “dream faith” will not accept—on principle—that perfection cannot reign here and now. He of true faith accepts daily shortcoming and imperfection as the inevitable cost of not yet having arrived in heaven.
Yes, our social regeneration would profit immensely from organized institutions of faith. The latter may even be necessary to accomplish the former. Right now, however, our religious institutions reflect an unbounded faith only in the decadent world for which they were organized. As the old Italian saying goes, we won’t find figs growing on a thistle bush.
With the political and social coherence our nation dissolving before our eyes, I naturally feel drawn to comment on the meaning of the dissolution. Yet I’m going to reserve that chore for another day. I think a further week of watching events unfold can’t help but leaven my observations. I need to settle myself down.
Frankly, my nerves have lately been shattered far more by a very personal confrontation than by the very public collapse of our nation’s rule of law… though the two, it turns out, are not completely unrelated. I received a call last Saturday night from a very close relative of mine. I will identify her simply as S, though none of my readers is likely to know her—and it’s even less likely that she would ever read this or any other of my columns. S was the closest person to me on earth when we were growing up. Somewhere along the line, a lot of things changed. Now that we’ve both passed well beyond our sixtieth birthday and are also separated by a thousand miles, we seldom speak to each other. The gaps in time and space appear to mar transmissions. Neither of us seems readily to understand what spiritual wavelength the other operates on.
Of course, S knows all about my round with prostate cancer this summer. If for no other reason than that, she tries to check in with me at least once a month. Our exchange of last Saturday night went along amicably for a while… and then, for some reason that I can’t seem to reconstruct in retrospect, the subject of the Corona Virus floated malodorously to the surface. I believe the first mention was hers, and that my response was simply to try to soothe her—to convince her that she needn’t worry about an illness whose infection-to-fatality rate was equal to that of a bad seasonal flu.
Shots fired. I was at once assured that I was completely wrong—that I had in no wise done research equal to S’s, whose dogged pursuit of the truth (I was told) could be matched by no one else in our family. She knew for a fact that children were dying of COVID-19: this was a five-alarm warning to our society. Everyone needed to be taking it with the utmost seriousness.
Fallen son of Adam that I am, I pushed back at the charge of being an ignoramus—and a bigot, to boot, who only processed information from a single source. (Don’t know where that came from: S never bothered to ask about my sources and never volunteered any of her own.)
I didn’t get really heated up, however, until a third person’s came into the discussion: someone who is as important to me as anyone on earth, and who I’d supposed was almost as important to S. This young man had checked himself into the emergency room last month in an incipient suicidal state which deeply alarmed him. The cause was, of course, the lockdown in which he and all his peers were living—are still living—day in and day out, week in and week out, in a vast Midwestern metropolis. I observed to S that older people like us should be prepared to run a two-or-three-chances-in-a-thousand risk of death if doing so might flatten the fearful spike in young suicides. Despair, in my opinion, was a much more formidable adversary than the flu.
Then came the response that touched a match to my powder keg. It was the baked-in-hell blarney about how kids shouldn’t be preoccupied with their amusement when their social activity jeopardizes the lives of others. This is what I propose to write at about some length today (perhaps because my attempts to dissect the claim in live conversation only met with being shouted over—and occasionally f-bombed: offensives which I ended up countering blow for loud, profane blow… God help us).
On the table, then, sits the propositions that you pose a menace to the lives of all around you if you circulate publicly in a normal fashion but do not strain your body almost to suffocation in an extremely abnormal fashion. If you decline to wear a mask, that is, you are engaged in a murder attempt.
My objections to this preposterous, insane, rabidly totalitarian groupthink are basically of two classes. To begin with the practical: respecting the claim above would bring us instantly to an absurd standstill—a train wreck of insoluble situations where life would simply have to go into a deep freeze. Consider the following few cases which spring to mind instantly.
Most contagions are primarily spread by hand: hands are constantly touching our faces and then proceeding to door knobs, paperwork, furniture, light switches, faucets, and so on. If we’re serious about not spreading SARS-COV2, then all of us should be required to wear gloves. The gloves themselves, as ersatz hands, must be shucked and replaced at intervals of no more than half an hour.
Infections of most varieties are spread through travel: ergo, we should impose rigorous travel bans. Trips should be permitted if we’re making an essential run to a nearby destination: e.g., a grocery store. Otherwise, wayfarers must be seized and punished.
We certainly shouldn’t permit people to smoke anything, whether nicotine, marijuana, or vaping compounds. We shouldn’t allow our fellow citizens to strain their lungs, because this would make them more tempting targets for respiratory infection… which, in turn, could be spread to us innocent bystanders. The same reasoning might be extended to obesity. People who are overweight tend to huff and puff, and one cough from their ample lungs… well, there you go. Potential murderers, every one!
And when it comes to jeopardizing the lives of others, why stop at the Corona Virus? Driving itself claims around 40,000 lives each year in this nation. We know that operation of cell phones while attempting to drive is risky behavior, and in much of the country it’s now illegal; but we also know that sustaining a conversation with someone in the passenger seat is distracting, as is attempting to manage food. Therefore, vehicles should not be allowed to move on the road that have an occupant in the passenger seat—unless, perhaps, that person is wearing a gag; and any driver caught behind the wheel with a Big Mac or a Smoothie King should be sent to Reeducation Camp for half a year.
As practically idiotic as any program must be that aims to ensure the “health of the collective”, I’m infinitely more disturbed by the moral assumptions—the immoral presumption, I should say—behind collectivist hygiene. The very idea that my society has the right to make me impede my airflow out of consideration for others is the most maniacally self-centered inversion of selflessness imaginable. I exist. You exist. Each of us poses certain potential threats to all others around us through the mere fact of our existence. We might misstep on an escalator with dozens of people below us. We might swipe an incautious pedestrian starting across an intersection while we’re peering at street signs. We might drop something that creates a sudden racket in the presence of a cardiac patient. Human life is a constant stream of such risks.
I’m not threatening your existence because I choose to have an existence. If I choose to sing, I’m not a threat to your life because I open my mouth and expel air. If I choose to sit at a table and eat a meal, I’m not a threat to your life because the juices circulating on my teeth may be ejected invisibly and borne away by the wind. If I hug a child who may go to the same kindergarten as yours, I’m not a threat to your life because an infection may be passed along from me the next school day that could eventually terminate you.
All such considerations are a selfish paranoia of unimaginable proportions. The spiritual sickness oozing from these equations is almost as baffling to me as it is disgusting.
Well… the phone conversation degenerated very quickly as its volume rose. I’m not proud of having lost my control to the extent that I did; and as a matter fact, I paid the price for it this past week. I won’t claim that I came down with a nice new case of COVID-19… but something flu-like certainly overtook me once my nerves were shattered and my resistance level bottomed out. Headache, congested lungs, extremely painful aching in the joints, neck pain, chills, weariness, a low-grade fever… I got almost no sleep on Saturday night, and this is the condition which started overshadowing me on Sunday morning.
Just to cinch the argument—not that I’m going to phone S with an update—my duel with this baleful flu-like adversary was treated by… staying quietly at home, nursing myself, taking lots of naps, minimizing my physical activity, and sustaining a good diet. I’m feeling immensely better as I sit here dictating this article. I didn’t need to go to the hospital. I didn’t need to sit in the emergency room. I didn’t need a physician prescribing Remdesivir or Hydroxychloroquine. I’ve had the flu before. I treated my round of plague sensibly, and… what do you know?… within three days it had virtually disappeared.
Am I now supposed to quarantine myself for two weeks? Why? I wear a mask in most public settings—and the mask absolutely prevents the Corona Virus from exiting, right? Besides, all the people around me have masks on, too, so they cannot breathe in my toxic exhalation. And since we’re both masked, everyone is doubly protected, yes? So the world is absolutely safe from any threat that might come from my direction. I’m so happy! Aren’t you happy?
It’s become a bromide that politics is now destroying civility, friendships, and even family relations because we’ve grown so intransigent in our views. We can no longer agree to differ. Um… true and not true, I would say. If you deny to me the freedom to take a few steps on God’s earth, enjoy God’s golden sun, and breathe God’s fresh air—if you even revile me as the author of a moral atrocity because I go down the sidewalk humming a tune—then we’re not disagreeing over whether the jogging trail should be plowed under to make a traffic bypass. You’re not even just committing an outrage against me personally. You’re blaspheming against Creation—you’re adoring Moloch.
I miss that little girl in those black-and-white photos, S. I’m sorry she exists no longer. I miss her so much! Who did that to her? Who kidnapped her and transformed her into what you are?
Trying to write a commentary this weekend while ignoring next week’s events is like staying mum about the proverbial pachyderm on the divan. Nevertheless, I don’t think the dawn of November 4 will satisfy our human craving for change. No, not for any of us. I don’t intend those words entirely in the sublime sense of Ecclesiastes (viz., “What has been is what will be; there’s nothing new under the sun”). I mean, as well, that our specific ordeal as hapless citizens of the US in 2020 will drag on. The forces that have plotted political ambushes and assassinations behind the scenes from within the CIA, the Department of Justice (smirk), and Wall Street will not let anything so banal as a national election decide who assumes the reins of power. We’ll have enough misery in local, state, and federal courts to last us well into the new year.
So don’t look for shelter, at last, from the directionless, spontaneous, insane whirlwinds of 2020 to appear by Thanksgiving, or even by Christmas. Don’t suppose that the finish line is just around the next turn. It isn’t. La paz empieza nunca, as Emilio Romero wrote shortly after World War II of the fight against creeping totalitarianism: “Peace begins… never.”
When I was concluding Why I’m Not Dead, an account of my recovery from Stage 4 cancer by turning away from mainstream American medicine, I confessed that my experience had shaken me loose from a lot of illusion and fond fantasy. None of my daydreams has been harder to surrender than the belief that we might actually leave the world a better place for our children. I chafe every night, as I bare my soul to God, against this sobering admission. But so it is. We completed the latter half of the twentieth century without inaugurating another world war or igniting another nuclear weapon over a human target… and what have we got to show for so much “progress”, really? A general populace so subservient in mind and spirit that the Chinese Communist Party may rule our nation soon without having fired a shot. We’re already scurrying around in search of “virtue points” even without the presence of eavesdropping cameras in every corner and closet.
My sister continues to believe that Putin pulls our president’s strings (as opposed to Ivanka and Jared), that COVID 19 leaves pericardial muscles permanently damaged, and anything else that her one rag of record tells her. My former minister was practically executing rhetorical high-fives in this week’s circular because one of her parishioners (an octogenarian with previous conditions, as I recall) was admitted to the ICU with COVID—as if to say, “You see? I told you all that this was deadly!” The personnel at the “integrative medicine” clinic where I receive weekly transfusions of Vitamin C continue to mask up religiously, despite mounting evidence that obstructing respiratory passages for hours can be severely harmful. (Ironically, a superstar in the integrative medicine world, Phoenix’s Colleen Huber, has been permanently banned from Twitter and roundly denounced on the Internet simply for highlighting some of these risks.)
Meanwhile, my son and his peers continue to battle with acute depression in their city’s lockdown, where many of them go the entire day without seeing another human being face to face. The suicide rate in their demographic has skyrocketed; yet the generation that ought to include their parents (and I write “ought” because we are all parents of the forthcoming generation) utters paranoid whines and whimpers because masks and lockdowns do not straitjacket the whole planet roundabout, 24/7. Think of it: people whose natural lifespan can scarcely now contain more than a mere decade or two of earthly time fume because the despair-inducing isolation of their children isn’t airtight.
Several governors have announced that large family gatherings over Thanksgiving will be banned in their state. The presidential candidate who has spent the past half-year cringing in his basement from the “pandemic” incoherently promises to open the nation back up while also promulgating a universal mask mandate. And the incumbent president, though at last lending an ear to Dr. Scott Atlas, also refuses to distance himself from Dr. Anthony Fauci (who now foresees extending mask- and lockdown-protocols until 2022).
Our news media are going full-throttle into bald-faced, gob-smacking propagandist mode. “Oh, look: he used income-averaging one year to pay virtually no tax! Hark ye, one and all! List, ye people!” And then, the next day… “No, debunked. Debunked, do you hear? ‘The Big Guy’ could be any guy… and why wouldn’t Xi’s minions, Putin’s henchmen, and the ruling-class dregs of Afghanistan and Iran want to pay this nice young man a few measly million for his advice? What’s the matter with you all? What has so polluted your souls? Why are you so cynical and wicked?”
Why? Because of an infectious disease called thinking, which somehow—incredibly—manages to spread even through the Internet and in other public forums. “This cannot stand! Stop the circulation of disruptive ideas! Fact-checkers, to your posts! Certified experts, hone ye your excising blades! Black-splashing redactors, let the ink run like the Nile in spate! We’ll do the rest. Wolf is at full-cock. Jim has girt his loins. Christiane’s cup of words runneth over. Brooke’s blinders are cinched tight in battle-mode. Dana has memorized the interview questions passed along via secure email. Let’s roll! Dorsey, Zuckerman, Bezos… just keep further breaches from opening. We’ll do the rest: we’ll make castles of clouds, tropical resorts of death camps, cordon-bleu cuisine of cow’s dung, sweet camomile of sulfur. We’ve got this. We’ve trained for this. It’s what we do.”
Satire is all that’s left to the seeker of truth who’s determined to honor the principle of free speech. It would be so easy to cry for the guillotine, to volunteer for journalist firing squads… but this, of course, is the very hell-on-earth vision that cultic ideologues hug to their hearts. We must somehow not become them. The energy consumed in mere resistance to such ugly impulses—in clinging to the negative virtue of not acting—leaves one exhausted. We must find that energy, as our better angels pant and faint.
Yet where does it end, if the lithe-tongued lackeys of totalitarian utopia are not to be jailed or gagged? “Foul deeds will rise, though all the earth o’erwhelm them, to men’s eyes”…. But will they? Why? How? When all men are forced to go masked, and when all speech is passed through filters that catch far more truth than face-diapers catch virons, why should we be confident that the vipers among us will writhe helplessly and wither away once the sun rises? The sun that never sets, yes—the immeasurable truth of eternity, yes… but between now and then? What justice will there be between now and then?
Karl Popper’s Note 27 to the seventeenth chapter of The Open Society and Its Enemies expresses confidence—from the perspective of over half a century ago—that the Press might be made to fulfill its civic duty if elections affected by misinformation were repeated, with the newsrooms and studios responsible for the fraud being made to foot the bill. How naive that great mind seems now… now that we know just how creative human mendacity can be. The truth exists. But does the unnamed “mother of three” interviewed in a high-crime neighborhood represent prevailing opinion? If it should turn out that she’s the mother of none and has been coached in her views, are those views necessarily wrong? Or if she’s all that she seems and also accurately projects the neighborhood’s mood, is a mood evidence that the real problem has been grasped?
I don’t see when or how this kind of thing gets better. The tribes among us will have to wear their masks and feathers until they kill each other off—and perhaps the rest of us with them. Those entrusted with words so that disputes may be reasonably resolved will continue to overdraw on Reason’s account until its last penny is assumed to be counterfeit. The wildfire must run its course. If a few of us find a low, barren place where the flames pass over lightly, then we will indeed have occasion to give thanks.
What a reckoning for the incendiarists, when the stars bend to earth and show them real fire!
I haven’t use the Dictaphone on my iPad for two years. I wouldn’t be using it now except that I can’t type with two hands. My right arm is about to fall off, and I don’t want to overdose on Tylenol, which has seen me through much of this week. I decided that the ordeal that I’m going through might be instructive in a more general way. I hope so… at any rate, it’s all I can think about for the moment.
I could adopt the attitude of a certain neurologist that I visited one time (and only one): that is, assume that any pain in my body is my prostate cancer metastasizing again. The arm seems to have somewhat migratory pain from the top of the shoulder down into the wrist. Migratory pain: that’s sort of heads up. And then… well, 2+2 = 4, doesn’t it? Patient had prostate cancer earlier this summer; now patient has migratory arm pain; ergo, must be the cancer coming back again in a new spot.
That’s the kind of analysis that a cancer patient would embrace naturally enough. I suppose all of us (or those of us with certain unwholesome personality traits, anyway) immediately lunge to the worst possible scenario. Something well worth remembering about science, however, is that it yields no absolute truth. If one is trying to diagnose a pain in the body or any other empirical problem, one looks for evidence to support this or that particular theory over its rivals. In my case, the “cancer” theory doesn’t have a whole lot of evidence behind it. It’s about as nuanced as the 2+2 = 4 formula: you had cancer before, you have a pain now, the pain must be cancer.
But I can also, with reflection, link the pain to specific “trigger” events having to do with excessive exercise. As a kind of would-be hitting instructor in baseball—an excavator of techniques long forgotten by the game—who operates a site at SmallBallSuccess.com, I construct hypothetical versions of century-old swings all the time. One in particular had me jamming my right elbow quite a bit in the follow-through. Not that I’ve ever played golf… but I believe golfers rather famously have the same problem. The severe compression of elbow and shoulder joints seems to have pinched a nerve, or perhaps strained ligament. When I was too foolish to leave the arm alone completely for several days, the pain quite predictably kept returning. It would get better for a while… but then I would assume that “a little bit better” meant “recovered”. Incredibly (I myself am amazed at my stupidity), I repeated the same miscalculation several times. At last a nagging discomfort became persistent aching of a magnitude greater than anything I’ve experienced for years.
So what should I conclude about over-exercise? I used to work out quite vigorously and, as one might say, religiously. Am I just getting old? Am I looking at incipient arthritis? Is there any relationship to my cancer adventure at all? I think the answer to the last of these posers is probably “yes”… but not the facile kind of “yes” that my neurologist wanted to promote. Rather, I suspect that, because I’m taking so many hormone-suppressants to deny prostate cancer its natural fuel, I am also denying my muscles and joints the fuel they need to recover from routine stress. If this is so, then perhaps I can find supplements that provide muscle support without hormones and move a long way toward solving my problem.
This is in fact the step that I am currently taking. (Sincerest thanks to Mr. Sanchez for suggesting Garden of Life FYI Restore Muscle—a 100 percent vegan option). But, of course, I’m proceeding without having proved my hypothesis: I’ve only rendered it the more likely of two proposals (which is, I would add, precisely the nature of scientific “proof” in practical application). Could I have overlooked other possibilities in my desire to embrace a less malign one?
I know from my first round with cancer that metastatic cells do tend to move in upon bones when incidental tears and stresses occur to muscle. What about my present condition would cancel that scenario?
Actually, I have a second pain of note—and it’s in my hip, because my right arm had grown so sore that I decided to throw left-handed in another baseball video. In doing so (another very predictable result, in hindsight), I strained the inside of my right thigh. Again, that source of pain is fully explicable as the product of repeated (and bloody foolish) aggravation. One special point of interest here, though, is that the hip has at last almost entirely recovered. I’ve gone back-and-forth with both injuries, but the hip is the one I’ve treated better. Recovery is almost complete.
That’s a positive sign. The arm has likewise shown improvement over periods when I nurse it along. That doesn’t sound like cancer.
I might further note that my heel spurs have been acting up even though I have done no jogging or extreme walking lately. The only explanation for that pain, inasmuch as there are no distressed muscle or bone complexes nearby, would once again be that even minimal exercise is not being handled very well—by any part of my body. Tissue is simply not rebuilding itself overnight the way it used to do.
Finally I should point out that my shoulder has been hurting me more right after I have a typing session, usually in the morning. (Hence my dictating to this annoying little iPad.) That seems pretty conclusive to me. Lots and lots of tiny muscle groups are used in typing: we all know about Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. The recurring pain after an episode of typing very probably points to muscle damage. What I need to do is a) take my new pills to allow my muscles and joints to recover in the absence of hormones, b) stop exercising with the ferocity that I used to bring to the endeavor, and c) find new exercises that keep me fit but do not put severe strain on my muscles.
This, I submit, is how scientific reasoning works. You form an hypothesis, you create tests for it, you look for evidence that supports or refutes it, and—in the happy case of discovering supportive evidence—you continue looking for more support… or contradiction. You consider evidence that is conspicuous by its absence. What does the theory fail to explain that you want to account for? Any theory can have a certain amount of support and yet be incorrect if the examiner proceeds no farther.
Too often today, unfortunately, our self-styled scientists exchange professional high-fives after they account for a rather restricted body of evidence, and they go no farther. Heaven forbid that anybody should turn over another stone! In fact, people who try to do so in certain celebrated cases lately have been publicly denounced, reviled, blackballed, and refused a place in the public exchange of ideas. I don’t recognize this as science, yet it’s the body of thought that my ex-minister refers to as the “best science” in a recent circular emailed to the congregation. The “best science”, according to her, insists that mask-wearing is our surest means of protection against CV-19. The implication, I guess, is that inferior science reaches a different conclusion; for how else can you rate this science if not by its conclusions? Do our “best scientists”, then, have any concern about the overwhelming evidence correlating mask mandates and lockdowns with the spread of the virus?
Apparently not. It is the “best scientists”, rather, who have refused to allow such information into the public forum. They offer no refutation of the graphs at RationalGround.com rational or similar websites; theirs is the tyranny, indeed, that has prevented the formal publication of a major Danish study on mask efficacy for over two months. Expected to reach the public eye in August, this research has so far been rejected by The Lancet and JAMA due to the political incorrectness of its outcomes. One contributor answered a query about the paper’s status in these words, more or less: “It will appear as soon as we find a journal brave enough to publish it” (source: Daniel Horowitz, Conservative Review, Episode 743).
One earns an instant ban from Twitter if one seeks to publicize any such inconvenient truth. The “best science” appears to be associated with the position of shutting people off when they question conclusions on the basis of an abundance of contradictory evidence. I’m glad the evidence in my own case doesn’t indicate that my cancer is spreading. I have recent lab results, as well, that wave no red flags, and I have the responsiveness of my body to gentle treatment when I decide to use a little common sense in my exercise routine. I’m not coddling myself. I’m not allowing myself to believe something that has little support. I’m choosing the conclusion for now that appears to have more evidence behind it. I am not panicking, though I easily could; I am looking at what facts are available to me. I’m also looking for further facts that seem unavailable but may be hiding from me in the shadows. Meanwhile, I’m taking action on the basis of the most probable explanation.
This is what science is supposed to do. It’s not good, bad, worse, or better. It is certainly not “the best”. It’s simply a struggle for us to make sense of physical reality, the roots of which extend well beyond our possible understanding.
As a person of (I hope) moderate education and intelligence, I deeply resent the attempt of the “best scientists”—as they clearly suppose themselves to be—to shut me up, to keep me from asking questions, to keep me from sharing theories with others, to make me fall in the line and march in one direction. This trend in our troubled society is the very antithesis of science. It will prove to be the death of science is if we allow it to thrive. It is an intellectual—yes, and a moral—cancer that has likely already metastasized and may yet precipitate our us.
If you were told less than half a year ago to buy a plot in the cemetery and get measured for a coffin—this by honored and decorated practitioners of mainstream American medicine—your perspective on a lot of things would change. Having groped your way back among the living (thanks to a Mexican clinic unsanctioned by Their Holinesses at the FDA), you’d find that you didn’t care much about matters once deeply important to you. “COVID-19: oh my God, there’s a .3 percent chance that I might die if infected!” Nope… sorry. Those odds don’t accelerate my heartbeat at all, except to make me angry with cowards who are terrified by them. “Well, how about this: the nation is poised to elect a bunch of socialists who will so mangle the system that the republic can never recover!” Okay, that’s disturbing… but it’s also a doom we have been collectively courting throughout my lifetime. We don’t want to make our own mistakes any more: we want the avuncular hand of Government shielding us and guiding us through every corridor of our mortal existence. We want to be treated as children… or as slaves whose only task is to vote for our Masters (for the brief time that we’re still allowed to vote).
I could get angry about that, yes… but why? Why should I believe that human folly, so graphically illustrated on every page of history, has been banished from our own epoch? Our species only learns, apparently, when water-boarded over and over in disaster. We Americans will get the government we richly deserve next January. The mainstream media made it all happen? The universities made it all happen? But who forced us to listen to the “news” or to submit our children to “higher education”?
Sometimes I think the only genuine Christians on earth live in China, where Xi Jinping’s ruthless tyranny suppresses, arrests, and tortures the faithful at accelerating rates. Meanwhile, our priests and ministers urge us from the pulpit to support CCP-like social engineering projects and to scorn individualism as selfishness. And we return every Sunday to hear more.
Maybe I was granted more time—how much more, nobody on earth knows—to peck out my contrarian telegrams as our society’s ship settles to the bottom. Maybe that’s my part of the exchange that renewed my life in the flesh. When massive food shortages make my eccentric diet impossible to sustain, or when rolling blackouts make my therapies impossible to continue, I suppose I’ll lapse into a steep decline. Or maybe not. Who knows? Nobody here on earth.
My wife and I think a lot about where the “cancer road” may take us. Most people, upon discovering that you’ve had cancer, assume that the scenario of your remaining life is something like the protagonist’s in that old Ben Gazzara series, Run for Your Life. You have a year left, maybe two. Oh, they’re all so sorry. Poor baby… maybe you’ll get three. I understand the reaction. I was actually fortunate that the American “health care” system declined to give me any treatment at all. My fellow patients at the Immunity Therapy Center in Tijuana had almost all suffered through a combination of surgery, radiation, and chemo. The struggle of their weakened bodies to profit from more salutary, holistic therapies as mine did was uphill, and often heart-breaking. In our medical system, cancer is “cured” in the same way as a death-row inmate is “freed” because a lawyer agrees to take on his appeal. What a hope!
But for the rest of us cancer-revenants, with our hale-and-hearty physiques and our arsenal of vitamin supplements, how is the future any different? Do we live until a car wreck claims us, or a heart attack? Or do we still consider ourselves as having cancer, which will likely come roaring back within days if our bottles of pills stop coming? Exactly what is cancer—what’s its modus operandi? Is the mass of humanity free of it, while the unhappy minority must feel its shadow descending over their shoulders during every birthday and Christmas they enjoy from now on? Is the burden of that shadow never to be removed in this life?
I could say (and I have said: I have a section of this tenor in Why I’m Not Dead) that we cancer survivors at least know which gate of the city is under attack. The “healthy” around us could be harvested tomorrow by a stroke, by an overdose, by an undetected cancer. (By COVID? Very, very unlikely. Could it be that we want to make a bubonic plague of SARS-2 because insulating ourselves from it gives us a sense of being shielded from all other assaults on our mortality?) That ubiquity of exposure is true, insofar as it goes: the Reaper is stalking everyone. But there remains something distinctly different about living in his shadow, day in and day out. The blissful ignorance that renders the shadow undetectable to others does, after all, generate a kind of bliss. We don’t enjoy that luxury.
And as far as I can tell, we’re not going to, we recovering cancer-holics. The sobered-up wino dare not ever take a sip again; and most of our group, I think, are just as leery of ever eating sugar or red meat. Half the contents of the grocery store now wear an invisible skull-and-crossbones as we run our eyes over the shelves. We don’t even have intact memories in which to seek comfort… or, at least, I don’t. When I recall the summers of pitching a baseball to my son in the back yard and try to sell myself on how happy times were then, my effort is immediately sabotaged by the thought, “But you had that hideous dark snake sliding around your entrails and didn’t even know it.” I cannot make ignorance blissful even in retrospect: my ignorant yesteryears are now horrid to me.
Which, I might argue, makes me stronger than ever: mortality will never again be able to creep up on me. That’s a great boon… but it can also be a great burden. The childishly pious around me tell me to trust that God will keep me sound and whole, as if I might make a virtue of delirium—might shut my eyes, stop my ears, and sing hymns of praise at full volume. “The night’s not there, there is no night: all is sweetness, joy, and light!” Fa-la-la, fa-la-la! And when I decline to chime in, they consign me to outer darkness. Maybe cancer is God’s judgment on me for refusing to accept His gift of long life. That God Incarnate promised us immense suffering as the likely recompense of virtue in this world is… is no longer the concluding instruction of the Beatitudes, I guess.
So you don’t seem to garner much comfort from the very quarter where you would have expected to receive it. Comfort. There are days, you know—many days—when I’ve thought that just seeing children playing in a park would chase the Shadow away. They say that misery loves company… but it’s not true. Or it’s only true of man in his most fallen moments. The Shadow lifts one out of self-preoccupation, lifts one to prospects only accessible from the mountain’s peak… but our sick society has seen fit to drape those happy little valleys in mist. If only I could have watched our local Single A baseball team play a few games this summer… but no. But no. But we had to exile every joyful social pastime from our midst because of THE PANDEMIC! Because of the abject hysteria with which we greeted even mortality’s most wavering, transient vulture-shadow on the far horizon, we pounded all the joy out of life. We pounded it sadistically, with the seventy-two knife wounds or cudgel blows that one reads of homicidal maniacs delivering to their victims. Some of us did it. I didn’t. Maybe you didn’t… but a lot of us did.
Appallingly many cancer patients did. I always want to say to them, “Don’t you think you already have death before you in a sufficiently palpable form without running panicked from doors that bang in the night?” I don’t understand them. I would have thought a round or two with cancer would give you the courage to measure your limitations as a secular being.
No children at play, and no ballgames: that’s been the hardest thing to bear. Not knowledge of my own mortality, but knowledge of how little my fellow beings recognize the precious gifts within theirs. I should have liked to see you all—you who don’t have cancer, or who don’t yet have it, or who don’t know that you have it—finding a spot in the sun, enjoying its golden touch, and blessing God for the day. That would have done my heart great good. Instead, I see you complaining—constantly complaining: the sun isn’t golden enough, its beam is too hot or too cold, the spot where it falls requires you to move too far. You understand nothing, and you learn nothing. The valleys I see are minute pockets of fools seeking refuge in caves. I’ll look for my little patch of sunlight today, as I do every day now. It’s a lonely spot, but it’s directly from God, and I’ll take it. I’m sorry that most of the rest of you won’t be there.
They fear life. In many ways, they hate it. It hasn’t been kind to them. Mother Nature may have burdened them with unattractive faces, or the luck of the draw may have given them a single parent who bothered about their childhood needs a quarter of the time—and never on weekends. Perhaps their temperament (who knows if such things are bestowed more by nature or nurture?) has prevented a comfortable degree of socialization. They are oddball, alone, and without a cast of supporting characters or even a stock of pleasant memories to offer them refuge.
They’re likely to thrust a tremendous investment of affection upon a dog or a cat—the childhood- or bosom-friend they never had whose big eyes can always be interpreted as limitlessly loving and whose muteness as perfect agreement. They tend to eat too much. Whatever care they give to personal appearance often borders on self-mutilation, either to channel the loathing they feel for an unprepossessing body or, perhaps, to ground the argument that they could make a swan of the ugly duckling if they gave a damn.
Males, more often than females, seek escape in the virtual reality of video games. The feminine taste leans more toward romantic fantasies available ad infinitum in ebook form. Both sexes exploit social media in search of escape or relief—the male more likely to slash and burn with a lexicon learned from public toilets, pretending to be the buccaneer iconoclast he hasn’t the intellectual depth or moral courage to play in real life; the female more often curling up warmly behind an avatar and a trove of cliches that render her easily “friendable”.
The female is much more likely to have an above-average exposure to formal education. One may even say that she is magnetically drawn to certain of the “social studies” in college because of the patented rationalizations they offer for her misery—the absolution of any personal guilt and the accusations lavished upon others. Graduate-degree mills in several fields are indeed nothing short of a “crutch industry”, thanks to an abundance of her kind in the post-grad population.
The male of this species that dwells in twilight, while not so successful academically (and, for that matter, distinguished by his unsuccess in all endeavors), isn’t stupid. He has a measure of intellect that might have been tapped for more-ambitious-than-average projects if only a means of motivating him existed. He has dedicated whatever talent he possesses, sadly, to sneering and snarling at the system that walls him in with evidence of his failure and inadequacy. He might possibly construct a bomb some day, and it might possibly be of the small nuclear variety: he has the acumen necessary for something of the sort. The question is… does he have the courage, the hellish courage (think of Milton’s Satan), needed actually to make other humans who’ve never done him wrong suffer far more than he ever has? Probably not. Mercifully, in most cases, no.
As a footnote, I should add that another kind of male exists: more sociable, much more “female”. Oddball yet eloquent, alienated yet readily found in company, he plays at the edge of twilight and represents an unstable ally. His companionable qualities make him risky: he may withdraw in a given crisis from endorsing outright anarchy. While he may follow whatever crowd forms to overthrow everything, he’s also apt to follow that hard day’s work with an evening at the theater or the cabaret. He’s not a bomb-thrower; and if you yourself are one, you shouldn’t assume that he has your back.
Whether courtesy of the Ivory Tower or simply through natural attraction, both “pure” sexes of Twilight People are idolaters of the future. The future is not now. In Baudelaire’s grand phrase, it’s anywhere out of this world. The details of that better—that oh-so-very-best—future are yet to be hatched out. Why bother? At the moment, the present needs annihilating, for Future Perfection cannot come to dwell among us until a place for it to dwell is swept clean. A mind even of average intelligence, to be sure, would grasp early in “the struggle” that the Golden Age isn’t going to show up during the lifetime of its footsoldiers. The Twilight People “get” this. They embrace it, indeed. The indefinite delay—the perpetual postponement—is more attraction than obstacle to the true believer. After all, the future’s real gift is its looming, its approach. One may devote one’s life to preparing the glorious way with far more zeal than one might bring to actual day-to-day life in any well-defined utopia.
The zeal’s the thing. Life is hateful, miserable, loathsome… but zeal for tomorrow makes today tolerable—and may tomorrow, always almost here, never complete its disillusioning arrival!
Two further characteristics will likely have struck you about the People of Twilight as I wrote the previous couple of paragraphs: 1) they have no faith in any metaphysical reality, and 2) their zeal for “unreal reality” has been nudged into the gap of that missing faith. It couldn’t be otherwise; for, as much as they shun daylight, they also fear the night. They hate life, but they hate death, too. They flee life, but can’t flee it too far—not beyond its edge; for in that chasm lurks the unthinkable, infinite and permanent oblivion. Precisely because they’ve made nothing of life, they must cling to it. It’s all they’ve got. Maybe it will yet yield something pleasant, something worthwhile. Probably not. But at least there’s that chance in a million. Beyond the pale, in the outer darkness… no chance of anything. Ever.
Perhaps the greatest advantage of faith is its taking the terror out of death… and perhaps an advantage very nearly as great is its bestowing purpose on life. Imagine the misery of having neither purpose nor a means of escape from purposelessness. A difficult spot to find oneself in. Twilight is the only alternative: a world that isn’t here-and-now but also isn’t the hereafter: a kind of ongoing suspension, a transport in cryogenic immobility from the hated world to the same world no longer hateful. And you get there by dreaming of a world no longer hateful… on whose behalf you ignore, or actively incinerate, all in the world around you.
I’ve come now to masks. I might have come to firebombing and Antifa, or to broadcasting made-up dramas in full awareness of their fantasy, or to translating every single human event into the plots and assaults of racists as ingeniously as John Donne transformed a flea into sexual intercourse. But masks will do. In fact, they are surely the supreme trope, the most expressive creation, of the People of Twilight. The masked face breathes, but does not partake of your filthy public air. That face may speak to you, but “socially distanced” and muffled by a sheet. Its features are not those of a “death mask”, for the eyes remain open; but without contributing gestures from mouth or nostrils, the intent behind the eyes remains always equivocal. Are they warm and simpatico… or are they hot and fuming?
The new face is half in the dying daylight and half in the clammy fingers of night. It’s neither fish nor fowl. Hands off! You don’t know it—you have no hermeneutic key to its thoughts. Wherever you may suppose it to be… it’s elsewhere. Welcome to the brotherhood of the stay-away-from-me’s.
The rationale undergirding (or hiding behind) the mask is similarly evasive. We are told that the mask keeps deadly microbes from exiting the wearer, and also that it protects the wearer from deadly microbes. (Yet mask-cultists never appear to register anxiety about infecting others: their concern is always for their own vulnerability.) The mask’s weave blocks minute viral particles… but it does not compromise the wearer’s lungs by trapping larger contaminants and bacteria before the mouth for hundreds of inhalation cycles. The mask is security against a virus traveling everywhere—everywhere—in aerosol form… yet it’s unnecessary outdoors, and its challenge is largely met by social distancing. Your mask will protect you from me… yet I must wear one, too, because yours may not protect you. COVID virons are so tiny that two mask-walls scarcely suffice to impede their attack… yet the visible gaps around the chin and the nose bridge are too small to open a passage. Bare hands are constantly in contact with noxious “naked air”… yet those same hands are forever readjusting the mask, with a thumb or fingertip slipping past the gate every time. Or if the wearer always “purels” and/or removes gloves before every adjustment… well, didn’t a bare hand grasp the second glove to come off, or didn’t a bare hand hit the pump of the Purel bottle? And there’s always that potentially lethal three or four feet between the bottle and the face, filled by ever-untrustworthy free air.
Neither dead nor alive. The People of Twilight are among us, and they are legion: just how many, we’ll soon find out. But a house divided against itself cannot stand, and a people half of whom flee the daylight cannot grow and prosper. What the deranged cultists of the fleeing half refuse to understand is that twilight, by definition, is unstable, ephemeral: a flight into night. To reject life is to run into death’s arms. To deny God is to affirm fearful oblivion. There’s no third option.
FREE EBOOK: From Sunday (October 11) to Thursday (October 15), this text that I created for a college class is will be available as a Kindle download at no cost whatever. Mainstream academic publishers, of course, didn’t want to take a chance on my thesis: that medieval scribes had faintly Christianized the ancient Irish legend of Cu Chulainn’s journey to the Other World and the Welsh Owein’s transits through the same interface. They bristled even more when I added Marie de France’s Eliduc to the list, these days treated only as an indictment of toxic masculinity. Yet the redemptive allegory, at least in the last two, is unmistakable… except to the unredeemed.
Somebody should perhaps write an addendum to The Screwtape Letters. My suspicion is that somebody already has, either in the “People’s Republic” of China or in the upper echelons of American academe.
The way that mass consciousness—if one can use those two words together—has been manipulated by the BLM movement (shakedown? insurrection?) is pure Satanic genius. When I read about the conduct of both Kansas City and Houston players as the anthem opened the NFL’s initial game, I realized what a tight little box had been sealed upon our national psyche. One team’s fifty stalwarts linked arms and bent knees; the other’s simply refused to take the field. Now, I couldn’t possibly care less about football at any level. I despise the game. As a boy, I knew several kids who were crippled for life while playing high school football, and one who actually died after a year on a respirator. Suits me fine if we just hand the whole sport off to the feminists. It’s about blindsiding or mobbing your adversary, not going mano a mano face-to-face.
But there are much more important issues involved here that we ignore at our peril. And, of course, the buffoonery is spreading. We all know about basketball‘s “woke” transformation, even those of us who couldn’t readily name six NBA teams. (Yeah, I’ve raised my hand.) Now baseball is crowding in for a piece of the idiot action—idiot on the surface, that is; for the genius is in the Puppeteer’s mind and not in the wooden heads of his Pinocchios. Several Major League clubs refused to perform in their empty stadiums (all stadiums in COVID America being empty nowadays—that’s part of the behind-the-scenes brilliance) after the shooting of Jacob Blake. None of these blockheads knew the details of the shooting: “cop shoots black dude…” okay, let’s roll. The ratiocinative chain went no further than that.
But consider the “meta” of these moron-level associative responses. Their very fuzziness is part of the mire wherein we have all waded and been trapped. Exactly what are you protesting, Mighty Casey? How about you, Slag Bronkowsky—and you, D’Shondrick Hayes? “Well, it’s the cops. They’re killing young black kids.” So… your best way of addressing the social disease underlying these fatalities is to squat on the flag or simply refuse to fulfill your player’s contract? “Gotta draw attention to the abuse, man.” Attention you have certainly drawn… but to what? To the police? To which police? “All of ’em, man!” So let’s suppose that all police are racist executioners disguised in blue. Doesn’t disrespecting the flag send the signal, rather, that you find the whole nation guilty? Doesn’t walking out on your job send the signal that you think everything’s a contemptible scam? “It is! Everything, just like you said. And yeah, everyone’s guilty.” Okay, we’re getting real clarity now. Gimlet precision. So it’s not about the cops: it’s about mainstream America and her political system. “Yeah, that’s right.” Because all of it—because everyone—is racist. “Yeah, that’s right.” So why didn’t you take a knee a long time ago to protest the quarter-of-a-million-plus black babies who are aborted every year? “Come on, man! You’re just trying to make this political!”
Wow. There’s a coherent, resonant message for you. Every passive spectator out there who doesn’t applaud me because I’m calling his eight-to-five world a load of crap is part of said load. It’s a world, by the way, that supplied him and other spectators with the means to blow a couple of Franklins on a ticket and watch me play. Yeah, I’ll play—but first you’ll open up for a scoop of this, cracker, and you’ll swallow!
Result: average Americans—hard-working, practical, common-sensical—are repulsed by all the self-righteous arrogance and logic-hostile bullying. The ordinary adult, being sane and responsible, grows angry. He turns his back on sports, which actually darkens his mood (because we do genuinely need some sort of frivolous escape-valve in our routine); and before very long, he may even begin to mutter thoughts only to himself, or at most to a very tight circle of familiars, that people of color are a tremendous annoyance.
Brilliant, I say. This is a huge accomplishment in the Puppeteer’s bid to subvert society. For we now have significant rifts opening up in our social fabric; and even better, the strain producing the splits isn’t merely economic or cultural—it’s the beginning stage of true racism. Not the phony kind, but the real thing. Well done, Master Screwtape!
Furthermore, the rifts are numerous and running in several directions, as opposed to reflecting a simple black/white antagonism. Whites who cannot bed down at night without mentally checking some box that confirms their moral superiority rush to endorse anything with “BLM” scrawled along its edge. It seems to me, honestly, as though their voice is much louder than any football team’s—their need of this bizarre bedtime prayer-of-the-Pharisee more urgent than any black athlete’s of publicizing abuses in racial profiling. The neo-fascist Antifa draws its most committed footsoldiers from the ranks of the “woke white”. If BLM didn’t exist, Antifa’s white buccaneers would have to invent it (which, you know, some of them—or their bloody-handed captains—actually did: few of the puppeteers are genetically African).
The presence of anti-white racist whites in the melee ensures that no sane discussion of specific cases or of appropriate generalities can occur. Any sentence that begins, “But did you realize that Jacob Blake… did you know that George Floyd…” draws immediate artillery fire. Yours not to question. Do not dare initiate the observation, “But if so many black kids were not raised without fathers…”. Oh, don’t you dare! Shut up! SHUT UP! SHUT THE F— UP!”
So now we have at least three phalanxes launching missiles at each other, with the Woke White appearing to be one with the black protest but, increasingly, distanced from it by their own zealous excesses. I really can’t say how numerous a fourth battle line (or, more properly, defensive line) may be, consisting of people with African DNA who claim the right to open, peaceful discussion; for few human beings have the courage of Candace Owens, Kimberly Klacik, or Allen West. Most of this happy few (or secret many, let us hope) do their claiming in a whisper, since they see how gaudily the outspoken are crucified. And the grumbling white mainstream, of course, hasn’t much interest in coming to their rescue, and probably would do so very ineptly if it tried. (I took a lot of flak from the White Right when I tried to publicize Kim Klacik’s campaign with my little trumpet last spring.)
Because of unique (and accidental?) circumstances, our ongoing social fragmentation is turbocharged in 2020. Most of us are already on the verge of suicide or homicide thanks to COVID lockdown. When you cook up a potful of people who have long since been denied their constitutional right to associate freely with fellow citizens, season it with paranoia about a “pandemic” whose fatalities approximate the curve of a bad flu year, and finally stir in racial hatred and armed bullying (with faces all duly masked)… well, old Screwtape outdid himself this time. Hell is boiling over into Middle Earth.
For the record, I fully grasp that young black males are profiled by police with excessive readiness. While it’s true that this demographic is disproportionately involved in certain crimes (such as possession of prohibited substances or of unlicensed firearms), the law requires probable cause to pry into a person’s private space… and “driving while black” is not probable cause. How many white parents would get the call that their college student has been incarcerated on drug charges if a single stop-and-search protocol were applied with equal rigor across the board? Yes, I understand.
But—as the words run in some Rap song that I recall from my son’s high school days—“dat ain’t dis, and dis ain’t dat.” The BLM frenzy is in fact drawing effective attention away from issues which might be ameliorated. A simple “stop profiling” would have done the trick; and I don’t know if kneeling for the anthem would remain the best delivery system, but at least it would not involve the open disrespect of—say—turning the back. So kneel, if you like. People of all creeds, classes, and colors could chime in, as well, without all the virtue-miming. Attorneys like Kathleen Zellner have made us aware that repeat petty offenders or “poor white trash” can get railroaded all the way to Death Row by detectives who cut corners. Buddy Woodall is serving life here in Georgia for a double murder because cops exploited his insomnia and despair to wring a confession from him in the absence of solid material evidence. Buddy is white… but he’s also a “nobody”. He grew up on a country lane lined with trailer homes. (And the locals, by the way, still will not discuss the case two decades later: too many figures that once wore badges are implicated in it.)
Patsy Ramsay, in contrast, was definitely somebody. She was beautiful (Miss Virginia at age 20), married to a wealthy Atlanta businessman, and—yes—Caucasian all the way. She passed the final twenty years of her life fighting, in court and before the public eye, the perception—shamelessly encouraged by Boulder, Colorado, detectives—that she had a hand in murdering her young daughter, JonBenét. One can scarcely imagine a more miserable existence: to know that your child died a violent death, to know that the crime occurred in your house as you slept, and to know that the killer is living free as the police push and squeeze to make the evidence point to you… all because your profile fits their boilerplate culprit for a domestic homicide. Who’s taking a knee for Patsy?
What misery! In a humane society, we would recognize that injustice is a thread binding us all together; but as subversive puppeteers try to rip our society apart, we are asked—no, required—to believe that only one race suffers. It’s insulting to the intelligence—and, by the way, demeaning to the race at issue, as if its members were condemned deterministically to slings and arrows and needed special protection. A black friend of mine once protested, during our discussion of my book Key to a Cold City, “But Dr. Harris… black ballplayers in Jackie Robinson’s day never ceased being black. Out of uniform, walking into a restaurant or hotel, they were still black. A white player might get dumped on by the fans or the press—but put him in street clothes, and he can go anywhere he wants.” That’s true… and so is this. It’s a remark that Larry Doby made about Yogi Berra, and I wish I’d found it in time for inclusion in the book. “… I repeated a few of those jokes myself [about Yogi’s being a dope, a caveman, etc.]. And it never once occurred to me in those early years that I was hurting Yogi’s feelings. The black guys around the league, there weren’t many of us, but when we would get together and talk, we knew we were all going through something together. That made the abuse a little easier to take. Now that I’m older, I wonder who helped Yogi take all that abuse” (Allen Barra, Yogi Berra, Eternal Yankee, pp. 62-63 ).
We all have our struggles. Everyone’s travail is unique in some way, yet all of us are alike in having to bear heavy burdens. If we forget that, then we will become incapable of true compassion or true justice. We will be animals that belch words, lots of words, without any regard for or suspicion of their meaning. I believe we’re already there.
P.S. In keeping with my bid to offer certain of my ebooks free at regular intervals, I’ve created a promotion for two of my fictional works about academe in the late twentieth century. Worse By Seven is a psychological novel about a professor who surrenders to despair amid the nihilism and debauchery that swamp him on an elite campus… but who at last finds a truth greater than this world’s. Ivory Gutter Shining Bright is a large collection of short stories, most of them wry or burlesque, some a little fantastical, about the pompous insanity that prevails in our towers of learning. Both ebooks may be downloaded free through this Tuesday (September 22).
I have to say that it was nice being in a sort of “news quarantine” for five weeks while I was receiving treatment in Tijuana. Of course, we’re never in such isolation anywhere these days—not really. Baja California, especially, was bristling in masks and “Corona panic”. The virus appears to have peaked a couple of months later in Mexico than in the U.S.; and with all the activity (legal and otherwise) occurring daily along the international border, infections were bound to proliferate. Yet my wife and I, having already witnessed the hysteria months earlier, were pretty unfazed. We wore masks, all right—on our walks to and from the Immunity Therapy Center, because the smog was so dense! That’s another reason, by the way, why people in metropolitan centers might perceive CV-19 as the bubonic plague: because their air is so foul, and many of them already have compromised respiratory systems from daily living.
As for the two of us, though senior citizens and (in the case of one) fighting off cancer, we never felt ourselves under siege from an invisible killer. (No, I don’t even regard cancer that way: on the contrary, my body’s healthy cells are cancer-killers.) To return to the states, therefore, and find that panic has revisited—or even exceeded—its original levels was a shock. What’s going on? If you feel at risk, stay at home. If you have to go out, wear a mask. If you happen to know that cloth masks have zero efficacy and mass-marketed models only about fifty percent, then… first of all, good for you: you did some homework. So take your fifty-fifty chance in the knowledge that, if you lose, you’ll probably end up with a bad cold for a few days. And try to stay off ventilators, which earn big money for hospitals but are death traps in most cases. Like masks, they keep healthy, oxygenated air from circulating (cancer dreads oxygen, by the way) and send back to the lungs higher levels of carbon dioxide along with whatever toxic microbes may lurk in your system. I learned that much many decades ago as a young man hiking about in the snow. Wearing a ski mask for hours is a surefire way to wake up with a chest cold the next morning.
Now, I’ve spoken to friends and relatives (not necessarily the same thing) who are terrified of CV-19 because they have personally watched it ravage an acquaintance. The disease is not a hoax, even though it isn’t anthrax vapor. Baseball star Freddie Freeman apparently thought he might die from his round with the contagion, despite being a young athlete in peak form. Curious to me, though, is the way such cases are publicized. Instead of delving into why somebody of Freddie’s demographic should have registered such an eccentrically, improbably severe response to COVID, broadcasters send the message, “See? Even this professional athlete lay briefly at death’s door. Just imagine what COVID could do to you if you don’t wear your mask and stay home!”
Same thing for the unfortunate kids who are playmates of a friend’s grandchildren: she informed me that their faces were all over the news in Florida as they fought for life on respirators. My first question is… why? Why are they news? Because, of course, so very few adolescents even show symptoms when they contract the disease. The press decided to run with these two young sufferers, I must assume, in order to purvey the mistaken notion that, yes, your little ones are also risking their lives when they cross their home’s threshold! A genuinely inquiring mind, in contrast, would ask, “Why these two, out of so many thousands? What in their profile has put a target on their back?”
Hospitals in the Palmetto State have been caught red-handed nudging a decimal point over to shift a 9.8 percent positive result on COVID screening tests to a 98 percent positive; and, of course, we’ve seen similar shenanigans all around the nation. (My brother-in-law personally knows of a case where a man who was shot to death was logged as a CV-19 victim. The bullet, you know, simply hastened along the inevitable!) We can all speculate about the financial and political motives of such fraudsters—or we can do as my sister does, and just break off the conversation once it jeopardizes the “deadly plague” narrative (the same approach as Twitter‘s and Facebook‘s, come to think of it, if “break off” can include throttling your adversary into permanent silence).
But my greater interest here isn’t in sordid profiteering or yet more sordid propagandizing: it’s at the other end. It’s in the population of bacchantes like my sister—people who appear to need the panic at some level, to embrace it as the filler of a great empty space in their lives. What precisely is that space? How did it evolve? As a sign of late-stage social cancer, how many years does it suggest our nation has to live?
Other kinds of irrationality would imply that we’re already in our death throes. BLM: now, there was one species of lunacy I was able to ignore entirely in Tijuana. That it had literally ignited large swathes of our major cities therefore struck me with a smack upon my return. One bad cop uses excessive force in one urban take-down… and, no, it’s not just black folks who have suffered the aggressions of that “one bad cop” in their municipality. Oh, but it is! And it’s not just one cop, but all of them; and it’s not just a municipality—it’s the whole damn country! Take it all down! Take everything down! Take those statues down! Take those street signs down!
Like millions of Americans, I had thought that I might escape the lunacy by losing myself in the faintly resuscitated baseball mini-season. (At the very least, the quality of play in today’s game is a sure antidote to insomnia.) But ESPN and the MLB aren’t content to pummel you with the Freddie Freeman narrative multiplied exponentially; that left jab is infallibly followed by the right hook of BLM. Entire teams kneeling as the flag is raised, “BLM” emblazoned on the side of bases around the infield… it’s so very much like the marketing of Freeman’s misfortune. Instead of inquiring into the specifics of abusive police practices and suggesting constructive solutions, the message is… what, exactly? Abolish police forces? Kill “pigs”? Or can it be tailored infinitely to suit individual taste? My son speaks of a case involving an athlete whose locker was defaced with the “n” word during high-school hazing incidents. Okay… so you’re against that. So am I—so is every sane human being. I also assume that any competent principal would suspend the bully who slams a weaker kid into the wall and shouts “faggot” at him. Does that mean that we should close down gymns across the nation?
Uh… what’s that, again? What are you saying?
That you hate slavery? That all whites, or all Southerners, should be punished for the institution’s presence in our history? Is that why all Confederates in bronze on rearing horses need to be torn down throughout Alabama? Is that why all streets and high schools named “Lee” or “Jackson” need to be rechristened “Marx” or “Engels”?
The so-called, self-styled Right has in fact primed us for this particular species of lunatic excess. I have taken the estimable Glenn Beck to task many times in recent years for truculently insisting that our Civil War was fought only and completely—by all participants—over the issue of slavery. Never mind that several Northern states allowed slave ownership, never mind that Lincoln excluded these from the censures and mandates of the Emancipation Proclamation, never mind that the vast majority of Southrons in uniform owned no slaves, never mind that some Southern slaveholders were themselves black, never mind that there were more abolitionist organizations in the South than in the North before John Brown’s murderous uprising torched the countryside, never mind that Lincoln could never have been elected had he admitted openly that he would meet secession with armed suppression, never mind that violent resistance to the war erupted in states as far flung as New York and Illinois when Lincoln’s draft was enforced… no, never mind history. Mr. Beck—Grandpa History in his rocking chair—would have none of it. And, to be fair, neither would a great many other Rightists who saw deploring the South as a slam-dunk manner of declaring their broad-mindedness, their distance from anything smacking of the John Birch Society. “I may be for ending food stamps, but I’m not a racist. I think flying a Confederate flag should be considered a hate crime.” Yeah, thanks for that, Conservatives. Beck’s own “defense” of Southern monuments was that we should never forget the evils of our past lest we slide back into them. A statue of General Beauregard, in other words, should hang like a scarlet “A” around the South’s neck perpetually so that all Americans may ensure that they don’t become like that!
Such projection of evil upon the Other is precisely—and I mean *precisely*—what BLM is doing to white people everywhere (and, somewhat more implicitly, to various other non-African minorities). It’s what Hitler (and Stalin, with much less “coverage”) did to Jews. It’s what mask-fanatics are doing to non-maskers, often (as YouTube has not yet managed to suppress) attacking free-breathers physically, sometimes with deadly force. The insane, homicidal self-righteousness of John Brown—and the Brownshirts—is in those attacks.
I happened to read just days ago a passage well over half a century old from Karl Popper’s Open Society and Its Enemies. One of the keenest minds of the modern era observed that the Hegelian, historicist distortion (we would say “progressivism” today) had infected, not just our Far Left and Far Right, but also our conservative center. We all have the inclination to view our civilization’s past as a Darwinian kind of climb up a staircase that this or that group seeks to impede. Leftist loons are destroying everything! No, Rightist racists want to conduct bloody purges! Mask-resisters are going to kill us all! Something’s very, very wrong with the world, and it’s… it’s them! It’s him! It’s outside of us, absolutely not us! We need to eliminate the not us, or we risk being pushed back down the stairs. Silence is violence! All good people must stand beside us!
You know what? The Left is right, the universities are right: there’s something very wrong with our society and our nation. It’s that we created them—and then denied our creation as them. Stalin and Mao didn’t force them upon us. They’re our children, our brothers and sisters: we made them. Yet we only ever point to them as what’s wrong without looking within ourselves to find what we did wrong in birthing them: the examples we failed to set, the message we failed to convey, the practice we failed to bring to what we preached. They’re full of hate because, though we’re not “deplorables”, we did something deplorable along the way. And penitence is not a matter of sharing half-and-half in their lunacy: of shutting down schools but not requiring masks, of taking a knee before the flag but supporting the local P.D., of melting down General Lee’s statues but safeguarding General Washington’s. The nature of our sin isn’t that we wouldn’t let our wayward children have half the house to tear up at playtime.
We have all sinned, and not against each other, but against Him who made us. We sin when we imagine we can make everything better than it was—that the fatal element of “what was” is not enduringly latent in us as we are. Our faith in staircases, in “progress“, is a sure symptom of our sin. And we give no sign from day to day—any of us—that we have diagnosed the illness.
Thanks to two acute conditions (neither of which is CV-19) concurrently afflicting me at the moment, my keyboard time must be limited… so what I have in mind for today is a kind of annotated list. It’s a bundle of Post-Corona awakenings that may or may not shock us from our collective stupor in time to save Western culture. Personally, I hope they slap us hard upside the head.
Our mass media are a vast propaganda machine. We should have known this long ago: many of us did… but not enough of us. Now, however, the volume has been turned up. Chris Cuomo’s faux confinement to sick bay, Brian Stelter’s narcissistic tear-letting, Anand Giridharadas’ denouncing the “freedom-obsessed” hypocrisy of our having built the nation on slavery and genocide… this is what we hear on CNN and MSMBC. Our local channels open their nightly blather with death tolls unindexed to numbers of infected, to preexisting conditions, to post mortem testing actually verifying cause of death. Their roving reporters compete to see who can wear the jauntiest mask in the most deserted locales as they chirp into a microphone half of whose layered microbes will easily penetrate the mask’s weave. Social media: Facebook accepts the W.H.O. as supreme arbiter of medical fact, glibly vaporizing any post that strays from the party line (the Chinese Communist Party line)… both FB and Twitter join in trying to airbrush Judy Mikovits from human history; and Wikipedia, in handling Mikovits’s career, explodes the rules of style to lard single sentences with the word “discredited” (like the “het hey, ho ho” refrain of a wind-up-and-go protest).
You can only serve up buffalo chips so many times to the customers before they begin to complain that they’re not getting pancakes. At least, this is a hope that I cherish.
The university system has burned down its own propaganda mill in a rabid zeal to be politically correct. I heard Dr. Mark Siegel declare to Tucker Carlson the other night that this hasn’t happened and will not happen—that universities are too conscious of their role in conditioning statist automatons to keep their gates shut. I disagree. I think the Ivory Elite may be hoist on its own petard here. After all, adherence of the masses to the will of Experts—surrender to the point of seeking permission to cross one’s threshold, of avoiding friends and family, of renouncing one’s livelihood, of depending exclusively on Big Brother for a monthly check—is game, set, and match for the progressive phalanx. This is everything the leftist professoriate has ever dreamed of. That the dream’s fulfillment also just happens to leave professors massively unemployed is… well, one of the innumerable contradictions besetting the utopian vision from every angle. The totalitarian utopia is mass suicide. We know that, we who have ears to hear.
On a purely practical level, Dr. Siegel, where will universities get the funding to remain open with the student body so depleted? Even if certain “scab” campuses cross the “virtue” line and resume business in August, many students and their parents will have used spring and summer to rethink their insane investment in such an undependable and very dispensable program of conditioning. People move on. Whatever endures in the Halls of Ivy, at any rate, will probably not feature the words “studies in” beside its catalogue description. The more objective disciplines will likely make a comeback: the squishy-mushy cults of victimhood will dry up and blow away.
So, too (may one hope?), will the top-heavy administrative bureaucracies that police pronouns and hound boys from campus after pushing “free sex” upon them.
The home-school movement will achieve escape velocity. I’m not an inveterate enemy of public education; but, in a matter obviously related to the one I’ve just mentioned, K-12 education has degenerated into Western-hostile, race-baiting, grievance-coddling claptrap. Bill Gates, who has become highly recognizable as one of the more twisted, wicked human beings on earth during these months (I won’t bother to devote a separate item to him), apparently sees a chance to cash in here, as he does in just about every incidence of calamity. His offer to educate New York State’s youth remotely by selling his software to every household appeals to fellow totalitarian travelers Cuomo and De Blasio… and that, of course, is no hope at all for the friends of freedom. On the other hand, when we consider that Germany is already introducing toddlers to sex games in the public curriculum (straight from the pages of Brave New World), we have to understand that the progressive objective for tomorrow’s little red schoolhouse in this nation is, likewise, nothing less than the dissolution of the nuclear family. Pulverizing public schools as they currently exist wouldn’t be a bad thing. What we rebuild from the fragments of rubble is another question… but I’m not convinced that megalomaniac psychos like Gates will have an easy time gluing kids to screens and weaning them from their natural craving for social contact. Teaching children isn’t equivalent to coaxing “Polly wants a cracker” from a large bird. Progressives wish it were so, and their vision requires that it be so—but here’s another point where fiction collides hard with reality.
The importance of the Second Amendment has suddenly become very apparent, even to slow learners. I confess that I myself used to be a little skeptical of the proposition that our neighbors who wear the blue would turn their guns on us if ordered by some tinpot dictator. Cops are human beings; and more than that, they’re good citizens who serve the community. They risk their lives to help innocent people survive and prosper. They also swear the same oath to the Constitution as do state and federal legislators, and most of them understand the words to which they’re pledging allegiance. How likely is it that such people, upon some maniac’s vaulting into the saddle of power after a mayoral or gubernatorial election, would suddenly turn about and draw their weapons on one of us for using the wrong gender pronoun or for flying an American flag on Cinco de Mayo?
How likely? Somewhere between “not unlikely” and “very likely”, it now appears. For every story about an Officer Greg Anderson (the Seattle patrolman suspended for posting a video confirming his fidelity to the Constitution), there seem to be four or five about cops cuffing mothers for taking their kids to the park or not wearing their masks properly. A SWAT team was unleashed upon a bar in West Texas last week where “social distancing” was not being practiced adequately. Is it so difficult to imagine a Governor Northam or a Governor Whitmer in the future sending in an armed shock-team of “child care services” Gestapo to steal children and cuff parents because Daddy refused to let Emily attend Trans Storytelling Day at the library?
This is precisely why we have a Second Amendment: i.e., so that the mindless henchmen and ambitious lackeys who surround tyrants will hesitate to invade a quiet neighborhood. If Daddy has a gun, and Daddy’s neighbors have guns, and their neighbors have guns—and if there’s a good chance that the whole block will pour into the streets locked and loaded if squad cars come to spirit Emily away—then our basic freedoms have a chance of surviving in the all-but-lawless future that awaits us. Otherwise, we might as well start packing for the gulag (and, as Solzhenitsyn has told us, there’s really not much need to pack).
Leftist mayors and governors have so eagerly slapped all their megalomaniac cards on the table that they may well be turned out massively in November. Even if Donald Trump fritters away the presidency and its coattail opportunities in House and Senate by refusing to admit that the Gates/Fauci Big Pharma/Wall Street complex duped him, how does totalitarianism survive at the state level? Northam, Whitmer, Cuomo—Newsom, Beshear, Mills, Hogan, Murphy, Wolf, Evers, Scott… what electorate would choose to have more lockdown, surveillance, moralistic harangue, frisking, home invasion, and arrest without warrant under these petty fools, lunatic harpies, and jackbooted utopians? Maybe some of them endure after those who would have resisted have fled to other states. Otherwise… well, I mustn’t risk my credentials as a pessimist by projecting that the masses may have struck a rock-bottom of self-debasement and are now poised to rebound. But one can hope, I suppose.
Finally—at long last—the rank and file may be primed to understand the extreme peril in which our unsecured power grid sets us. President Trump deserves much credit for his executive order in spring of last year and a second this year, both targeting the Sword of Damocles that has swayed over our heads for decades. Trump has fought this good fight virtually alone, among elected officials. Bush did nothing, Obama did nothing, Democrat super-majorities did nothing in past years, the recent Republican super-majority did nothing—only Trump has stood up to stingy, stupid power companies, on the one side (the conventionally Republican, big-business side), and to Russia-and-China-placating, New World Order ideologues, on the other (the conventionally Democrat—but ever more “Swampublican”—side). The President desperately needs to trumpet his virtuous defense of the nation instead of satirizing his opponents in the media and defending his role in locking down a once-healthy economy. He needs to swallow his ego and think of the millions—the 300 million, approximately—who would lose their lives within a year if we went dark all across the continent. He needs to emphasize what his obtuse predecessor failed to remark: that no hostile attack is required to fry the grid—that an especially powerful solar flare (overdue by some estimates) would suffice. He needs to tap into the hysteria created by a hyped-up round of particularly nasty flu and redirect this paranoia to a sensible apprehension.
People are afraid for no reason at the moment. Presumably, as the Black Plague dissolves into fifty shades of gray, they’ll go back to worrying about fish on their front lawns by the year 2030. Now is the time to give them something rational and substantial to worry about. It’s also a great time to brand naysayers (since Trump so likes the game of branding) as Chinese Communist Party collaborators, or just plain useful idiots. It’s time for a touch of Joe McCarthy; because McCarthy—oh, by the way—was dead right about our system’s being infused with those who would destroy it. Today he would be more right than ever.
If Donald Trump, instead, continues to kidney-punch Brian Kemp and to mince words about Anthony Fauci’s disastrous leadership, then we quite probably get no securing of the grid in 2021, or 2022… and, maybe the following year, politics simply ceases to matter to the nine in ten of us who will painfully have checked out of this world.