A very fast one today. I watched the new British documentary about 9/11 on Netflix yesterday. Was disappointed that the producers gave certain logistical inconsistencies and physical impossibilities in the official narrative a complete pass. Obviously, their interests lay elsewhere. It would have been okay just to say as much: no need to caricature those of us suspicious of the two towers’ incredibly telescopic collapse (repeated later by WTT 7) as believing that the planes themselves were just photoshopped in for the television audience and that the arms industries wanted to gin up business by starting a war.
The chosen focus was on the CIA’s refusing to share vital information with the FBI in a timely manner, and in the subsequent cover-up of a significant Saudi connection by all branches of the federal government. Here’s a proposal: might the CIA have thought that Mohammed Atta & Co. were working undercover for Uncle Sam right up until the time that they steered the jetliners into the Towers? Might the idea, that is, have been to stage four highjackings on the same day, land the jets in DC, incur a few civilian casualties as the planes and hostages were retaken, and then use the incident as an excuse for pressuring Saddam and ridding the House of Saud of Osama Bin Laden’s annoying influence? The highjackers, one must presume, would not have been in on the whole scheme; they would have supposed that they were winning one for the Great Gipper in the Sky. Yet they may well have received a degree of CIA training, and that organization was most certainly trying to recruit them. This could have been a case of A playing B who thought he was playing A.
My theory would explain why no government agency has been forthcoming with details about events leading up to the highjackings. The truth would make the CIA look indefensibly, perhaps fatally naive and obtuse. And the Saudis, as co-owners of the secret, would of course have to be protected from public scrutiny lest they spill the beans. If I’ve learned nothing else about careerist bureaucrats in high places during my long life, it’s that they know how to cover their tails.
Look at Operation Fast and Furious, where the Obama Administration was trying to use ATF to manipulate public opinion against the Second Amendment. When things blew up, agents in the field were disgraced, released, and otherwise gagged if they attempted to cry foul.
Or look at the Kennedy assassination. There’s quite a bit of evidence now that the CIA was bankrolling bands of Cuban exiles to train for guerrilla-like raids on Castro’s domain, that Oswald fell in with such a group that had been penetrated 100 percent by Castro’s own operatives, and that the president was thus shot thanks to training (and perhaps hardware) paid for by our tax dollars. Again, we got played by the people we were trying to play.
I wish I could believe that 9/11 were as “simple” as this. The trouble is that a massive structure severely compromised on one side about 80 percent of the way up doesn’t neatly accordion to the ground: its crown leans into the wound and falls. The Popular Mechanics study that gave the thumbs up to this insane physics… I really do need to get a copy of the report.